Causa Králík Poster
Film

Causa Králík (1980)

Originaltitel: Causa králík

1980-03-26 · CS
55%
Nutzerwertung
2 Stimmen

In an unusual, apolitical approach, director Jaromil Jires has fashioned a standard drama that features an older lawyer with failing health who goes to practice in the countryside. His series of odd court cases reveals more about the human condition than about law. In one of these litigations a wayward nephew has cheated his elderly aunt out of her savings. In court, the nephew insists the money was a gift, but his aunt explains she only gave him the money as a loan. Although the lawyer technically wins the case, everything of value seems lost in the meantime. His services are paid for in rabbits because the aunt has no currency, and in the end, the nephew cons his aunt into parting with her savings anyway. Other cases expose similar types of petty corruption.

Feature zu Causa Králík lesen →

Hauptbesetzung

Vollständige Besetzung & Crew →
Miloš KopeckýMiloš KopeckýJUDr. LukášekMarie BrožováMarie Brožovábabička MárováJaroslav SatoranskýJaroslav SatoranskýJounMartin RůžekMartin Růžeksoudce JUDr. PetříkZlata AdamovskáZlata Adamovskásekretářka ZuzanaPavel ZedníčekPavel ZedníčekPastyříkAlena VránováAlena VránováLukáškováKarel AugustaKarel AugustaVránaVlastimil HašekVlastimil HašekChmelařVladimír HlavatýVladimír HlavatýChmelař, st.Jana AndresíkováJana AndresíkováChmelařováMarie MálkováMarie MálkováZdenička Vránová

Movie DNA

Regiepräferenz262418Schauspielpräferenz623694 · 413281 · 347050LänderpräferenzXcEpochenpräferenz1980

Häufige Fragen zu Causa Králík

Worum geht es in Causa Králík?

In an unusual, apolitical approach, director Jaromil Jires has fashioned a standard drama that features an older lawyer with failing health who goes to practice in the countryside. His series of odd court cases reveals more about the human condition than about law. In one of these litigations a wayward nephew has cheated his elderly aunt out of her savings. In court, the nephew insists the money was a gift, but his aunt explains she only gave him the money as a loan. Although the lawyer technically wins the case, everything of value seems lost in the meantime. His services are paid for in rabbits because the aunt has no currency, and in the end, the nephew cons his aunt into parting with her savings anyway. Other cases expose similar types of petty corruption.