
On Screen (1972)
Analog video was not only an alternative to more expensive motion picture film for artists. It was also a viable new medium with specific attributes all its own. In On Screen, characteristics such as video snow and audio static become more pronounced and distorted with each subsequent version of the artist within the “TV” frame. As Lynda Benglis performs a sequence of pulling faces for the camera in triplicate, we become aware that the performance is based on memory, sometimes faulty—a kind of symbiotic conflation of artist and machine.
Feature zu On Screen lesen →Medien

Hauptbesetzung
Vollständige Besetzung & Crew →Movie DNA
Ähnliche Titel
Mehr Dokumentarfilm →
Sehmoment
Sehmoment
Sehmoment
Sehmoment
Sehmoment
Sehmoment
Sehmoment
Sehmoment
Sehmoment
Sehmoment
Sehmoment
SehmomentHäufige Fragen zu On Screen
Worum geht es in On Screen?
Analog video was not only an alternative to more expensive motion picture film for artists. It was also a viable new medium with specific attributes all its own. In On Screen, characteristics such as video snow and audio static become more pronounced and distorted with each subsequent version of the artist within the “TV” frame. As Lynda Benglis performs a sequence of pulling faces for the camera in triplicate, we become aware that the performance is based on memory, sometimes faulty—a kind of symbiotic conflation of artist and machine.
Wie lang ist On Screen?
On Screen hat eine Laufzeit von 8 Minuten.
